4.8 Article

Transferred wrinkled Al2O3 for highly stretchable and transparent graphene-carbon nanotube transistors

期刊

NATURE MATERIALS
卷 12, 期 5, 页码 403-409

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/NMAT3572

关键词

-

资金

  1. Research Centre Program of IBS (Institute for Basic Science) in Korea
  2. International Research & Development Program of the NRF of Korea [2011-00242]
  3. MEST
  4. Human Resources Development programme of the KETEP [20124010203270]
  5. Korea government Ministry of Knowledge Economy
  6. Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning, Republic of Korea [IBS EM1304] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite recent progress in producing transparent and bendable thin-film transistors using graphene and carbon nanotubes(1,2), the development of stretchable devices remains limited either by fragile inorganic oxides or polymer dielectrics with high leakage current(3,4). Here we report the fabrication of highly stretchable and transparent field-effect transistors combining graphene/single-walled carbon nanotube (SWCNT) electrodes and a SWCNT-network channel with a geometrically wrinkled inorganic dielectric layer. The wrinkled Al2O3 layer contained effective built-in air gaps with a small gate leakage current of 10(-13) A. The resulting devices exhibited an excellent on/off ratio of similar to 10(5), a high mobility of similar to 40 cm(2) V-1 s(-1) and a low operating voltage of less than 1V. Importantly, because of the wrinkled dielectric layer, the transistors retained performance under strains as high as 20% without appreciable leakage current increases or physical degradation. No significant performance loss was observed after stretching and releasing the devices for over 1,000 times. The sustainability and performance advances demonstrated here are promising for the adoption of stretchable electronics in a wide variety of future applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据