4.8 Article

Solution-processed small-molecule solar cells with 6.7% efficiency

期刊

NATURE MATERIALS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 44-48

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/NMAT3160

关键词

-

资金

  1. Center for Energy Efficient Materials
  2. Energy Frontier Research Center
  3. Office of Basic Energy Sciences of the US Department of Energy [DE-DC0001009]
  4. Air Force Office of Scientific Research [FA9550-11-1-0063]
  5. National Science Foundation [DMR-0856060]
  6. Agency for Science Technology and Research (A*Star) of Singapore

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Organic photovoltaic devices that can be fabricated by simple processing techniques are under intense investigation in academic and industrial laboratories because of their potential to enable mass production of flexible and coste-ffective devices(1,2). Most of the attention has been focused on solution-processed polymer bulk-heterojunction (BHJ) solar cells3-7. A combination of polymer design, morphology control, structural insight and device engineering has led to power conversion efficiencies (PCEs) reaching the 6-8% range for conjugated polymer/fullerene blends(8,9). Solution-processed small-molecule BHJ (SM BHJ) solar cells have received less attention, and their efficiencies have remained below those of their polymeric counterparts(10). Here, we report efficient solution-processed SM BHJ solar cells based on a new molecular donor, DTS(PTTh2)(2). A record PCE of 6.7% under AM 1.5G irradiation (100mWcm(-2)) is achieved for small-molecule BHJ devices from DTS(PTTh2)(2) V PC70BM (donor to acceptor ratio of 7: 3). This high efficiency was obtained by using remarkably small percentages of solvent additive (0.25% v/v of 1,8-diiodooctane, DIO) during the film-forming process, which leads to reduced domain sizes in the BHJ layer. These results provide important progress for solution-processed organic photovoltaics and demonstrate that solar cells fabricated from small donor molecules can compete with their polymeric counterparts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据