4.8 Article

Important role for organic carbon in subduction-zone fluids in the deep carbon cycle

期刊

NATURE GEOSCIENCE
卷 7, 期 12, 页码 909-913

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/NGEO2291

关键词

-

资金

  1. Sloan Foundation through the Deep Carbon Observatory (Reservoirs and Fluxes and Extreme Physics and Chemistry programmes) [DOE DE-FG-02-96ER-14616]
  2. Johns Hopkins University
  3. Geophysical Laboratory of the Carnegie Institution of Washington
  4. WDC Research Fund
  5. Johns Hopkins Graduate Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Supercritical aqueous fluids link subducting plates and the return of carbon to Earth's surface in the deep carbon cycle(1,2). The amount of carbon in the fluids and the identities of the dissolved carbon species are not known, which leaves the deep carbon budget poorly constrained(3). Traditional models(4,5), which assume that carbon exists in deep fluids as dissolved gas molecules, cannot predict the solubility and ionic speciation of carbon in its silicate rock environment. Recent advances enable these limitations to be overcome when evaluating the deep carbon cycle(6-8). Here we use the Deep Earth Water theoretical model(7) to calculate carbon speciation and solubility in fluids under upper mantle conditions. We find that fluids in equilibrium with mantle peridotite minerals generally contain carbon in a dissolved gas molecule form. However, fluids in equilibrium with diamonds and eclogitic minerals in the subducting slab contain abundant dissolved organic and inorganic ionic carbon species. The high concentrations of dissolved carbon species provide a mechanism to transport large amounts of carbon out of the subduction zone, where the ionic carbon species may influence the oxidation state of the mantle wedge. Our results also identify novel mechanisms that can lead to diamond formation and the variability of carbon isotopic composition via precipitation of the dissolved organic carbon species in the subduction-zone fluids.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据