4.8 Article

Hotspots of anaerobic ammonium oxidation at land-freshwater interfaces

期刊

NATURE GEOSCIENCE
卷 6, 期 2, 页码 103-107

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/NGEO1683

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21077119]
  2. Knowledge Innovation Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [KZCX2-EW-410-01]
  3. special fund of State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control [12L03ESPC]
  4. Beijing Nova Program [2011095]
  5. K.C. Wong Education Foundation, Hong Kong
  6. ERC Advanced Grant [232937]
  7. German Max Planck Society
  8. Danish National Research Foundation
  9. European Research Council (ERC) [232937] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

For decades, the conversion of organic nitrogen to dinitrogen gas by heterotrophic bacteria, termed heterotrophic denitrification, was assumed to be the main pathway of nitrogen loss in natural ecosystems. Recently, however, autotrophic bacteria have been shown to oxidize ammonium in the absence of oxygen, yielding dinitrogen gas. This process, termed anammox, accounts for over 50% of nitrogen loss in marine ecosystems(1-5). However, the significance of anammox in freshwater ecosystems has remained uncertain(6,7). Here, we report the occurrence of anammox hotspots at land-freshwater interfaces of lake riparian zones in North China, using molecular and isotopic tracing technologies. Laboratory incubations measuring anammox activity at substrate concentrations no more than 10% of those observed in situ yielded some of the highest potential activities reported for natural environments to date. Potential rates of anammox peaked in sediments sampled from the interface between land and water, as did the abundance of annamox bacteria. Scaling our findings up to the entire lake system, we estimate that interfacial anammox hotspots account for the loss of 103 g Nm(-2) yr(-1) from this lake region, and around one fifth of the nitrogen lost from the land-water interface.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据