4.8 Article

Variable North Pacific influence on drought in southwestern North America since AD 854

期刊

NATURE GEOSCIENCE
卷 6, 期 8, 页码 617-621

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/NGEO1862

关键词

-

资金

  1. Newkirk Center for Science and Society at the University of California, Irvine
  2. National Science Foundation [ATM: 0823554, AGS: 1103360]
  3. NSFC [41230524]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Precipitation in southwestern North America has exhibited significant natural variability over the past few thousand years(1). This variability has been attributed to sea surface temperature regimes in the Pacific and Atlantic oceans, and to the attendant shifts in atmospheric circulation patterns(1,2). In particular, decadal variability in the North Pacific has influenced precipitation in this region during the twentieth century(3,4), but links to earlier droughts and pluvials are unclear. Here we assess these links using delta O-18 data from a speleothem from southern California that spans AD 854-2007. We show that variations in the oxygen isotopes of the speleothem correlate to sea surface temperatures in the Kuroshio Extension region(5) of the North Pacific, which affect the atmospheric trajectory and isotopic composition of moisture reaching the study site. Interpreting our speleothem data as a record of sea surface temperatures in the Kuroshio Extension, we find a strong 22-year periodicity, suggesting a persistent solar influence(6) on North Pacific decadal variability. A comparison with tree-ring records of precipitation(1) during the past millennium shows that some droughts occurred during periods of warmth in the Kuroshio Extension, similar to the instrumental record(4). However, other droughts did not and instead must have been influenced by other factors. Finally, we find a significant increase in sea surface temperature variability over the past 150 years, which may reflect an influence of greenhouse gas concentrations on variability in the North Pacific.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据