4.8 Article

Life in the hydrated suboceanic mantle

期刊

NATURE GEOSCIENCE
卷 5, 期 2, 页码 133-137

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/NGEO1359

关键词

-

资金

  1. Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Modena through the CARBRIDGE
  2. French CNRS-INSU INTERRVIE
  3. ECORD [2010]
  4. Region Ile de France (IPGP)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The recesses of the oceanic crust harbour microbes that influence geochemical fluxes between the solid Earth and the hydrosphere(1,2). In the roots of the crust, mantle-derived rocks are progressively hydrated by hydrothermal circulation, a process known as serpentinization. The associated release of molecular hydrogen could provide metabolic energy for microbes(3). Phylogenetic analyses of chimneys associated with seafloor hydrothermal systems have provided direct but spatially restricted evidence for the existence of active microbial communities in these hydrated rocks(4); indirect evidence comes from isotopic analyses of drill cores(5). Here, we examine fully serpentinized peridotites recovered from the Mid-Atlantic Ridge, using Raman microspectroscopy and electron microscopy. We detect high concentrations of organic matter, of two types, intimately associated with serpentine-hosted hydrogarnets. One type contains a complex mixture of aliphatic and aromatic compounds and functional groups such as amides, usually associated with biopolymers such as proteins, lipids and nucleic acids. The other corresponds to dense aggregates of thermally evolved carbonaceous matter, with a weak structural organization, which we attribute to the maturation of carbon compounds present in the other type of organic matter identified. We suggest that the observed endogenic accumulations of organic matter result from past microbial activity within the serpentinized oceanic crust, potentially supported by the by-products of serpentinization. We further suggest that the proposed crustal community mediates elemental fluxes from the Earth's mantle to the oceans.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据