4.8 Review

Resilience of persistent Arctic mixed-phase clouds

期刊

NATURE GEOSCIENCE
卷 5, 期 1, 页码 11-17

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/NGEO1332

关键词

-

资金

  1. NOAA [NA08OAR4310543]
  2. U.S. DOE [DE-FG02-08ER64574, DE-FG02-05ER63965, DE-FG02-05ER64058, DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  3. NSF Science and Technology Center for Multiscale Modeling of Atmospheric Processes [ATM-0425247]
  4. Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research of the U.S. DOEnergy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  5. DOE [DE-SC0002037]
  6. NOAA's Climate Goal
  7. NSF ARC [1023366]
  8. National Science Foundation (NSF) [ATM-0639542, AGS-0951807]
  9. DOE's Office of Science
  10. Directorate For Geosciences
  11. Div Atmospheric & Geospace Sciences [951807] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  12. Directorate For Geosciences
  13. Division Of Polar Programs [1023366] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Arctic region is particularly sensitive to climate change. Mixed-phase clouds, comprising both ice and supercooled liquid water, have a large impact on radiative fluxes in the Arctic. These clouds occur frequently during all seasons in the region, where they often persist for many days at a time. This persistence is remarkable given the inherent instability of ice-liquid mixtures. In recent years it has emerged that feedbacks between numerous local processes, including the formation and growth of ice and cloud droplets, radiative cooling, turbulence, entrainment and surface fluxes of heat and moisture, interact to create a resilient mixed-phase cloud system. As well as the persistent mixed-phase cloud state there is another distinct Arctic state, characterized by radiatively clear conditions. The occurrence of either state seems to be related, in part, to large-scale environmental conditions. We suggest that shifts in the large-scale environment could alter the prevalence of mixed-phase clouds, potentially affecting surface radiative fluxes and the Arctic energy budget.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据