4.8 Article

POT1 loss-of-function variants predispose to familial melanoma

期刊

NATURE GENETICS
卷 46, 期 5, 页码 478-481

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ng.2947

关键词

-

资金

  1. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia of Mexico
  2. Cancer Research UK [C1287/A9540, C8197/A10123, C588/A4994, C588/A10589]
  3. Isaac Newton Trust
  4. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC)
  5. Cure Cancer Australia
  6. NHMRC
  7. Cancer Council Queensland
  8. Dutch Cancer Society [UL 2012-5489]
  9. Genomics Initiative
  10. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness through Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII)
  11. Consolider-Ingenio RNAREG Consortium
  12. Wellcome Trust [WT091310]
  13. Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited Trustees
  14. Red Tematica de Investigacion del Cancer (RTICC) del ISCIII
  15. Cancer Research UK [16565, 10589, 13031] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Deleterious germline variants in CDKN2A account for around 40% of familial melanoma cases(l), and rare variants in CDK4, BRCA2, BAP1 and the promoter of TERT have also been linked to the disease(2-5). Here we set out to identify new high-penetrance susceptibility genes by sequencing 184 melanoma cases from 105 pedigrees recruited in the UK, The Netherlands and Australia that were negative for variants in known predisposition genes. We identified families where melanoma cosegregates with loss-of-function variants in the protection of telomeres 1 gene (POT1), with a proportion of family members presenting with an early age of onset and multiple primary tumors. We show that these variants either affect POT1 mRNA splicing or alter key residues in the highly conserved oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide-binding (OB) domains of POT1, disrupting protein-telomere binding and leading to increased telomere length. These findings suggest that POT1 variants predispose to melanoma formation via a direct effect on telomeres.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据