4.8 Article

Assessing the phenotypic effects in the general population of rare variants in genes for a dominant Mendelian form of diabetes

期刊

NATURE GENETICS
卷 45, 期 11, 页码 1380-+

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ng.2794

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Human Genome Research Institute of the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) [U54 HG003067]
  2. Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  3. Pfizer Inc.
  4. NIH [5-T32-GM007748-33]
  5. Fulbright Diabetes UK Fellowship [BDA 11/0004348]
  6. Doris Duke Charitable Foundation [2006087]
  7. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases grant [K24 DK080140]
  8. NHLBI [N01-HC-95170, N01-HC95171, N01-HC-95172]
  9. National Institute for Minority Health and Health Disparities
  10. Norwegian Research Council
  11. European Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Genome sequencing can identify individuals in the general population who harbor rare coding variants in genes for Mendelian disorders1-7 and who may consequently have increased disease risk. Previous studies of rare variants in phenotypically extreme individuals display ascertainment bias and may demonstrate inflated effect-size estimates8-12. We sequenced seven genes for maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY) 13 in well-phenotyped population samples14,15 (n = 4,003). We filtered rare variants according to two prediction criteria for disease-causing mutations: reported previously in MODY or satisfying stringent de novo thresholds (rare, conserved and protein damaging). Approximately 1.5% and 0.5% of randomly selected individuals from the Framingham and Jackson Heart Studies, respectively, carry variants from these two classes. However, the vast majority of carriers remain euglycemic through middle age. Accurate estimates of variant effect sizes from population-based sequencing are needed to avoid falsely predicting a substantial fraction of individuals as being at risk for MODY or other Mendelian diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据