4.8 Article

Analysis of immune-related loci identifies 48 new susceptibility variants for multiple sclerosis

期刊

NATURE GENETICS
卷 45, 期 11, 页码 1353-+

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ng.2770

关键词

-

资金

  1. US National Institutes of Health
  2. Wellcome Trust
  3. UK MS Society
  4. UK Medical Research Council
  5. US National MS Society
  6. Cambridge National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre
  7. DeNDRon
  8. Swedish Brain Foundation
  9. Swedish Research Council
  10. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation
  11. Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation
  12. Foundation for Strategic Research
  13. MRC [G0800759, G0000934, G0600329, G0800675, G0700061] Funding Source: UKRI
  14. Chief Scientist Office [CZB/4/710, ETM/137] Funding Source: researchfish
  15. Crohn's and Colitis UK [M11-1] Funding Source: researchfish
  16. Medical Research Council [G0600329, G0800675, G0800759, G0801418B, G0700061, G0000934] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using the ImmunoChip custom genotyping array, we analyzed 14,498 subjects with multiple sclerosis and 24,091 healthy controls for 161,311 autosomal variants and identified 135 potentially associated regions (P < 1.0 x 10(-4)). In a replication phase, we combined these data with previous genome-wide association study (GWAS) data from an independent 14,802 subjects with multiple sclerosis and 26,703 healthy controls. In these 80,094 individuals of European ancestry, we identified 48 new susceptibility variants (P < 5.0 x 10(-8)), 3 of which we found after conditioning on previously identified variants. Thus, there are now 110 established multiple sclerosis risk variants at 103 discrete loci outside of the major histocompatibility complex. With high-resolution Bayesian fine mapping, we identified five regions where one variant accounted for more than 50% of the posterior probability of association. This study enhances the catalog of multiple sclerosis risk variants and illustrates the value of fine mapping in the resolution of GWAS signals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据