4.8 Article

Mutations in TCF12, encoding a basic helix-loop-helix partner of TWIST1, are a frequent cause of coronal craniosynostosis

期刊

NATURE GENETICS
卷 45, 期 3, 页码 304-307

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ng.2531

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre Oxford
  2. Oxford University Clinical Academic Graduate School
  3. Oxfordshire Health Services Research Committee
  4. Oxford Craniofacial Unit Charitable Fund
  5. Thames Valley Comprehensive Local Research Network
  6. Dutch Center for Translational Molecular Medicine
  7. Carolien Bijl Foundation
  8. US National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R01DE016320, R01DE019650]
  9. Wellcome Trust [093329]
  10. MRC [MC_UU_12010/6] Funding Source: UKRI
  11. Medical Research Council [MC_UU_12010/6] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Craniosynostosis, the premature fusion of the cranial sutures, is a heterogeneous disorder with a prevalence of similar to 1 in 2,200 (refs. 1,2). A specific genetic etiology can be identified in similar to 21% of cases(3), including mutations of TWIST1, which encodes a class II basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factor, and causes Saethre-Chotzen syndrome, typically associated with coronal synostosis(4-6). Using exome sequencing, we identified 38 heterozygous TCF12 mutations in 347 samples from unrelated individuals with craniosynostosis. The mutations predominantly occurred in individuals with coronal synostosis and accounted for 32% and 10% of subjects with bilateral and unilateral pathology, respectively. TCF12 encodes one of three class I E proteins that heterodimerize with class II bHLH proteins such as TWIST1. We show that TCF12 and TWIST1 act synergistically in a transactivation assay and that mice doubly heterozygous for loss-of-function mutations in Tcf12 and Twist1 have severe coronal synostosis. Hence, the dosage of TCF12-TWIST1 heterodimers is critical for normal coronal suture development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据