4.8 Article

Reduced dosage of ERF causes complex craniosynostosis in humans and mice and links ERK1/2 signaling to regulation of osteogenesis

期刊

NATURE GENETICS
卷 45, 期 3, 页码 308-313

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ng.2539

关键词

-

资金

  1. Greek Ministry of Education [PYTHAGORAS II KA2092, PENED 03ED626, HERAKLEITOS II KA 3396, SYNERGASIA 09SYN-11-902]
  2. NIHR Biomedical Research Centre
  3. Department of Health's NIHR Biomedical Research Centres funding scheme
  4. Oxford Craniofacial Unit Charitable Fund
  5. Department of Health, UK, Quality, Improvement, Development and Initiative Scheme (QIDIS) (YES)
  6. Wellcome Trust [090532, 093329]
  7. Medical Research Council [G0901599, MR/J006742/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. MRC [G0901599] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The extracellular signal related kinases 1 and 2 (ERK1/2) are key proteins mediating mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling downstream of RAS: phosphorylation of ERK1/2 leads to nuclear uptake and modulation of multiple targets(1). Here, we show that reduced dosage of ERF, which encodes an inhibitory ETS transcription factor directly bound by ERK1/2 (refs. 2-7), causes complex craniosynostosis (premature fusion of the cranial sutures) in humans and mice. Features of this newly recognized clinical disorder include multiple-suture synostosis, craniofacial dysmorphism, Chiari malformation and language delay. Mice with functional Erf levels reduced to similar to 30% of normal exhibit postnatal multiple-suture synostosis; by contrast, embryonic calvarial development appears mildly delayed. Using chromatin immunoprecipitation in mouse embryonic fibroblasts and high-throughput sequencing, we find that ERF binds preferentially to elements away from promoters that contain RUNX or AP-1 motifs. This work identifies ERF as a novel regulator of osteogenic stimulation by RAS-ERK signaling, potentially by competing with activating ETS factors in multifactor transcriptional complexes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据