4.8 Article

Genome-wide association study of follicular lymphoma identifies a risk locus at 6p21.32

期刊

NATURE GENETICS
卷 42, 期 8, 页码 661-664

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ng.626

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Cancer Institute (NCI), US National Institutes of Health (NIH) [CA122663, CA104682, CA45614, CA89745]
  2. American Cancer Society [IRG-07-06401]
  3. Agency for Science and Technology and Research of Singapore (A*STAR)
  4. NCI [R01 CA91253, R01 CA118444, CA62006]
  5. Swedish Cancer Society
  6. Swedish Research Council
  7. Danish Medical Research Council
  8. Information Management Services, Inc.
  9. NIH (NCI)
  10. US Public Health Service (PHS) [N01-PC-65064, N01-PC-67008, N01-PC-67009, N01-PC-67010, N02-PC-71105]
  11. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia
  12. Cancer Council NSW
  13. University of Sydney Medical Foundation
  14. Canadian Cancer Society
  15. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  16. German Jose Carreras Leukemia Foundation [DJCLS_R04/08, R07/26f]
  17. EC [QLK4-CT-2000-00422]
  18. Federal Office for Radiation Protection (Germany) [StSch4261, StSch4420]
  19. Spanish Ministry of Health [06/02/0073]
  20. FIS [08-1555]
  21. Marato TV3 (Spain) [051210]
  22. La Fondation de France [1999 0084 71]
  23. Compagnia di San Paolo di Torino
  24. Health Research Board, Ireland
  25. Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic [MZ0 MOU 2005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To identify susceptibility loci for non-Hodgkin lymphoma subtypes, we conducted a three-stage genome-wide association study. We identified two variants associated with follicular lymphoma at 6p21.32 (rs10484561, combined P = 1.12 x 10(-29) and rs7755224, combined P = 2.00 x 10(-19); r(2) = 1.0), supporting the idea that major histocompatibility complex genetic variation influences follicular lymphoma susceptibility. We also found confirmatory evidence of a previously reported association between chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma and rs735665 (combined P = 4.24 x 10(-9)).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据