4.8 Article

The regulated retrotransposon transcriptome of mammalian cells

期刊

NATURE GENETICS
卷 41, 期 5, 页码 563-571

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/ng.368

关键词

-

资金

  1. Australian Postgraduate Award through the Australian government Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs
  2. CJ Martin Fellowship from the Australian NHMRC [ID 428261]
  3. MEXT
  4. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of the Japanese Government
  5. ARC Special Research Centre for Functional and Applied Genomics
  6. NHMRC
  7. Australian NHMRC
  8. UQ postdoctoral research fellowship
  9. Telethon Foundation [TCP00094]
  10. Associazione Italiana Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC)
  11. Fondazione Compagnia di San Paolo
  12. EMBO long-term fellowship
  13. Medical Research Council [G9900991B] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although repetitive elements pervade mammalian genomes, their overall contribution to transcriptional activity is poorly defined. Here, as part of the FANTOM4 project, we report that 6-30% of cap-selected mouse and human RNA transcripts initiate within repetitive elements. Analysis of approximately 250,000 retrotransposon-derived transcription start sites shows that the associated transcripts are generally tissue specific, coincide with gene-dense regions and form pronounced clusters when aligned to full-length retrotransposon sequences. Retrotransposons located immediately 5' of protein-coding loci frequently function as alternative promoters and/or express noncoding RNAs. More than a quarter of RefSeqs possess a retrotransposon in their 3' UTR, with strong evidence for the reduced expression of these transcripts relative to retrotransposon-free transcripts. Finally, a genome-wide screen identifies 23,000 candidate regulatory regions derived from retrotransposons, in addition to more than 2,000 examples of bidirectional transcription. We conclude that retrotransposon transcription has a key influence upon the transcriptional output of the mammalian genome.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据