4.8 Article

Variants in KCNQ1 are associated with susceptibility to type 2 diabetes mellitus

期刊

NATURE GENETICS
卷 40, 期 9, 页码 1092-1097

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ng.207

关键词

-

资金

  1. Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) of Japan
  2. National Institute of Biomedical Innovation (NIBIO) of Japan
  3. Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare of Japan
  4. New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO)
  5. Cooperative Link of Unique Science and Technology for Economy Revitalization (CLUSTER, Tokushima, Japan)
  6. Hong Kong Research Grants Committee Central Allocation Scheme [1/04C]
  7. Ministry of Health and Welfare of the Republic of Korea [00-PJ3-PG6-GN07-001]
  8. Swedish Research Council
  9. Sigrid Juselius Foundation
  10. Folkhaelsan Research Foundation
  11. European Foundation for the Study of Diabetes
  12. Swedish Diabetes Research Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We carried out a multistage genome-wide association study of type 2 diabetes mellitus in Japanese individuals, with a total of 1,612 cases and 1,424 controls and 100,000 SNPs. The most significant association was obtained with SNPs in KCNQ1, and dense mapping within the gene revealed that rs2237892 in intron 15 showed the lowest P value (6.7 x 10(-13), odds ratio (OR) = 1.49). The association of KCNQ1 with type 2 diabetes was replicated in populations of Korean, Chinese and European ancestry as well as in two independent Japanese populations, and meta-analysis with a total of 19,930 individuals (9,569 cases and 10,361 controls) yielded a P value of 1.7 x 10(-42) (OR = 1.40; 95% CI = 1.34-1.47) for rs2237892. Among control subjects, the risk allele of this polymorphism was associated with impairment of insulin secretion according to the homeostasis model assessment of beta-cell function or the corrected insulin response. Our data thus implicate KCNQ1 as a diabetes susceptibility gene in groups of different ancestries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据