4.8 Article

Utilizing redox-chemistry to elucidate the nature of exciton transitions in supramolecular dye nanotubes

期刊

NATURE CHEMISTRY
卷 4, 期 8, 页码 655-662

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/NCHEM.1380

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [Sfb 448, Sfb 951]
  2. Integrative Research Institute for the Sciences IRIS Adlershof (Berlin)
  3. National Science Foundation [CHE-1012790]
  4. Alexander von Humboldt-Foundation
  5. US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-SC0001088]
  6. ARO grant [W911NF-09-0480]
  7. DARPA grant [N66001-10-1-4063]
  8. DOE Center for Excitonics (an Energy Frontiers Research Center)
  9. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  10. Division Of Chemistry [1012790] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Supramolecular assemblies that interact with light have recently garnered much interest as well-defined nanoscale materials for electronic excitation energy collection and transport. However, to control such complex systems it is essential to understand how their various parts interact and whether these interactions result in coherently shared excited states (excitons) or in diffusive energy transport between them. Here, we address this by studying a model system consisting of two concentric cylindrical dye aggregates in a light-harvesting nanotube. Through selective chemistry we are able to unambiguously determine the supramolecular origin of the observed excitonic transitions. These results required the development of a new theoretical model of the supramolecular structure of the assembly. Our results demonstrate that the two cylinders of the nanotube have distinct spectral responses and are best described as two separate, weakly coupled excitonic systems. Understanding such interactions is critical to the control of energy transfer on a molecular scale, a goal in various applications ranging from artificial photosynthesis to molecular electronics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据