4.8 Article

A tension-mediated glycocalyx-integrin feedback loop promotes mesenchymal-like glioblastoma

期刊

NATURE CELL BIOLOGY
卷 20, 期 10, 页码 1203-+

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41556-018-0183-3

关键词

-

资金

  1. US National Institutes of Health NCI [CA138818-01A1, CA192914-01, CA174929-01, CA085482, CA202241, CA163155]
  2. Ruth Kirschstein NRSA [F32 CA174319]
  3. UCSF Brain Tumor Research Program [T32 CA151022]
  4. NHLBI [T32 HL007544]
  5. UCSF Brain Tumor SPORE Tissue Core NIH/NCI [P50 CA097257]
  6. NIH [1U01CA168878]
  7. NIH/NINDS [R01 NS081117]
  8. CIRM [RB5-07409, TG2-01153]
  9. NCI [R01 CA227942]
  10. Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI) - Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea [HI14C3418]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBMs) are recurrent lethal brain tumours. Recurrent GBMs often exhibit mesenchymal, stem-like phenotypes that could explain their resistance to therapy. Analyses revealed that recurrent GBMs have increased tension and express high levels of glycoproteins that increase the bulkiness of the glycocalyx. Studies showed that a bulky glycocalyx potentiates integrin mechanosignalling and tissue tension and promotes a mesenchymal, stem-like phenotype in GBMs. Gain-and loss-of-function studies implicated integrin mechanosignalling as an inducer of GBM growth, survival, invasion and treatment resistance, and a mesenchymal, stem-like phenotype. Mesenchymal-like GBMs were highly contractile and expressed elevated levels of glycoproteins that expanded their glycocalyx, and they were surrounded by a stiff extracellular matrix that potentiated integrin mechanosignalling. Our findings suggest that there is a dynamic and reciprocal link between integrin mechanosignalling and a bulky glycocalyx, implying a causal link towards a mesenchymal, stem-like phenotype in GBMs. Strategies to ameliorate GBM tissue tension offer a therapeutic approach to reduce mortality due to GBM.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据