4.8 Article

E-box-independent regulation of transcription and differentiation by MYC

期刊

NATURE CELL BIOLOGY
卷 13, 期 12, 页码 1443-U149

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ncb2355

关键词

-

资金

  1. 'Fondo de Investigacion Sanitario' (FIS, Spanish Ministerio de Sanidad)
  2. Spanish 'Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia', AGAUR
  3. Fundacio La Marato
  4. Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia y Educacion
  5. DFG
  6. Ramon y Cajal fellowship
  7. 'La Caixa' fellowship
  8. PFIS
  9. ICREA Funding Source: Custom

向作者/读者索取更多资源

MYC proto-oncogene is a key player in cell homeostasis that is commonly deregulated in human carcinogenesis(1). MYC can either activate or repress target genes by forming a complex with MAX (ref. 2). MYC also exerts MAX-independent functions that are not yet fully characterized(3). Cells possess an intrinsic pathway that can abrogate MYC MAX dimerization and E-box interaction, by inducing phosphorylation of MYC in a PAK2-dependent manner at three residues located in its helix loop helix domain(4). Here we show that these carboxy-terminal phosphorylation events switch MYC from an oncogenic to a tumour-suppressive function. In undifferentiated cells, MYC MAX is targeted to the promoters of retinoic-acid-responsive genes by its direct interaction with the retinoic acid receptor-alpha (RAR alpha). MYC MAX cooperates with RAR alpha to repress genes required for differentiation, in an E-box-independent manner. Conversely, on C-terminal phosphorylation of MYC during differentiation, the complex switches from a repressive to an activating function, by releasing MAX and recruiting transcriptional co-activators. Phospho-MYC synergizes with retinoic acid to eliminate circulating leukaemic cells and to decrease the level of tumour invasion. Our results identify an E-box-independent mechanism for transcriptional regulation by MYC that unveils previously unknown functions for MYC in differentiation. These may be exploited to develop alternative targeted therapies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据