4.8 Article

Tudor staphylococcal nuclease is an evolutionarily conserved component of the programmed cell death degradome

期刊

NATURE CELL BIOLOGY
卷 11, 期 11, 页码 1347-U198

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/ncb1979

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council
  2. Swedish Cancer Society
  3. Swedish Research Council for Environment
  4. Agricultural Sciences and Spatial Planning
  5. EC FP6 and FP7 Programs
  6. Carl Tryggers Foundation
  7. Pehrssons Fund
  8. Wenner-Gren Foundation
  9. Royal Swedish Academy of Agriculture and Forestry
  10. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion, Spain

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Programmed cell death (PCD) is executed by proteases, which cleave diverse proteins thus modulating their biochemical and cellular functions. Proteases of the caspase family and hundreds of caspase substrates constitute a major part of the PCD degradome in animals(1,2). Plants lack close homologues of caspases, but instead possess an ancestral family of cysteine proteases, metacaspases(3,4). Although metacaspases are essential for PCD5-7, their natural substrates remain unknown(4,8). Here we show that metacaspase mcII-Pa cleaves a phylogenetically conserved protein, TSN (Tudor staphylococcal nuclease), during both developmental and stress-induced PCD. TSN knockdown leads to activation of ectopic cell death during reproduction, impairing plant fertility. Surprisingly, human TSN (also known as p100 or SND1), a multifunctional regulator of gene expression(9-15), is cleaved by caspase-3 during apoptosis. This cleavage impairs the ability of TSN to activate mRNA splicing, inhibits its ribonuclease activity and is important for the execution of apoptosis. Our results establish TSN as the first biological substrate of metacaspase and demonstrate that despite the divergence of plants and animals from a common ancestor about one billion years ago and their use of distinct PCD pathways, both have retained a common mechanism to compromise cell viability through the cleavage of the same substrate, TSN.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据