4.8 Article

An APOBEC3A-Cas9 base editor with minimized bystander and off-target activities

期刊

NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 36, 期 10, 页码 977-+

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nbt.4199

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R35 GM118158, RM1 HG009490]
  2. Desmond and Ann Heathwood MGH Research Scholar Award
  3. St. Jude Children's Research Hospital Collaborative Research Consortium award
  4. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program
  5. NHLBI [DP2OD022716, P01HL032262]
  6. St. Jude Children's Research Hospital Collaborative Research Consortium
  7. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [DP2HL137300, P01HL032262] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  8. NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE [RM1HG009490] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  9. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [R35GM118158] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Base editor technology, which uses CRISPR-Cas9 to direct cytidine deaminase enzymatic activity to specific genomic loci, enables the highly efficient introduction of precise cytidine-to-thymidine DNA alterations(1-6). However, existing base editors create unwanted C-to-T alterations when more than one C is present in the enzyme's five-base-pair editing window. Here we describe a strategy for reducing bystander mutations using an engineered human APOBEC3A (eA3A) domain, which preferentially deaminates cytidines in specific motifs according to a TCR>TCY>VCN hierarchy. In direct comparisons with the widely used base editor 3 (BE3) fusion in human cells, our eA3A-BE3 fusion exhibits similar activities on cytidines in TC motifs but greatly reduced editing on cytidines in other sequence contexts. eA3A-BE3 corrects a human beta-thalassemia promoter mutation with much higher (>40-fold) precision than BE3. We also demonstrate that eA3A-BE3 shows reduced mutation frequencies on known off-target sites of BE3, even when targeting promiscuous homopolymeric sites.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据