4.2 Article

Time-dependent physicochemical characteristics of Malaysian residual soil stabilized with magnesium chloride solution

期刊

ARABIAN JOURNAL OF GEOSCIENCES
卷 9, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s12517-015-2100-4

关键词

Residual soil; Non-traditional additive; Magnesium chloride (MgCl2) solution; UCS; FESEM; FTIR

资金

  1. Ministry of Education Malaysia under the Fundamental Research Grant (FRGS) [R.J130000.7822.4F658]
  2. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM)
  3. Construction Research Centre UTM

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effects of non-traditional additives on the geotechnical properties of tropical soils have been the subject of investigation in recent years. This study investigates the strength development and micro-structural characteristics of tropical residual soil stabilized with magnesium chloride (MgCl2) solution. Unconfined compression strength (UCS) and standard direct shear tests were used to assess the strength and shear properties of the stabilized soil. In addition, the micro-structural characteristics of untreated and stabilized soil were discussed using various spectroscopic and microscopic techniques such as X-ray diffractometry (XRD), energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometry (EDAX), field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and Brunauer, Emmett and Teller (BET) surface area analysis. From the engineering point of view, the results indicated that the strength of MgCl2-stabilized soil improved noticeably. The degree of improvement was approximately two times stronger than natural soil after a 7-day curing period. The results also concluded the use of 5 % of MgCl2 by dry weight of soil as the optimum amount for stabilization of the selected soil. In addition, the microstructural study revealed that the stabilization process modified the porous network of the soil. The pores of the soils had been filled by the newly formed crystalline compounds known as magnesium aluminate hydrate (M-A-H).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据