4.8 Article

Minimum information about a marker gene sequence (MIMARKS) and minimum information about any (x) sequence (MIxS) specifications

期刊

NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 29, 期 5, 页码 415-420

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/nbt.1823

关键词

-

资金

  1. Howard Hughes Medical Institute Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHGRI NIH HHS [U54 HG003273, R01 HG005975-02, R01 HG005975] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NHLBI NIH HHS [U01 HL098957] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIAID NIH HHS [P30 AI045008] Funding Source: Medline
  5. NIDDK NIH HHS [UH2 DK083981, K01 DK090285] Funding Source: Medline
  6. Natural Environment Research Council [CEH010021, NE/E006353/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. NERC [NE/E006353/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. Direct For Biological Sciences
  9. Division Of Environmental Biology [0936498] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  10. Directorate For Geosciences
  11. Division Of Earth Sciences [0738888] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  12. Division Of Environmental Biology
  13. Direct For Biological Sciences [0832652] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Here we present a standard developed by the Genomic Standards Consortium (GSC) for reporting marker gene sequences-the minimum information about a marker gene sequence (MIMARKS). We also introduce a system for describing the environment from which a biological sample originates. The 'environmental packages' apply to any genome sequence of known origin and can be used in combination with MIMARKS and other GSC checklists. Finally, to establish a unified standard for describing sequence data and to provide a single point of entry for the scientific community to access and learn about GSC checklists, we present the minimum information about any (x) sequence (MIxS). Adoption of MIxS will enhance our ability to analyze natural genetic diversity documented by massive DNA sequencing efforts from myriad ecosystems in our ever-changing biosphere.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据