4.8 Article

Rational association of genes with traits using a genome-scale gene network for Arabidopsis thaliana

期刊

NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 28, 期 2, 页码 149-U14

出版社

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/nbt.1603

关键词

-

资金

  1. Carnegie Institution for Science
  2. National Science Foundation [MCB-0520140]
  3. Korean government [2009-0063342, 20090070968]
  4. Yonsei University [2008-7-0284, 2008-1-0018]
  5. National Science Foundation, National Institutes of Health
  6. Welch Foundation [F1515]
  7. Packard Foundation
  8. Div Of Molecular and Cellular Bioscience
  9. Direct For Biological Sciences [0820823] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  10. National Research Foundation of Korea [2008-0062292, 2009-0070968] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We introduce a rational approach for associating genes with plant traits by combined use of a genome-scale functional network and targeted reverse genetic screening. We present a probabilistic network (AraNet) of functional associations among 19,647 (73%) genes of the reference flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. AraNet associations are predictive for diverse biological pathways, and outperform predictions derived only from literature-based protein interactions, achieving 21% precision for 55% of genes. AraNet prioritizes genes for limited-scale functional screening, resulting in a hit-rate tenfold greater than screens of random insertional mutants, when applied to early seedling development as a test case. By interrogating network neighborhoods, we identify AT1G80710 (now DROUGHT SENSITIVE 1; DRS1) and AT3G05090 (now LATERAL ROOT STIMULATOR 1; LRS1) as regulators of drought sensitivity and lateral root development, respectively. AraNet (http://www.functionalnet.org/aranet/) provides a resource for plant gene function identification and genetic dissection of plant traits.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据