4.8 Article

Genome evolution across 1,011 Saccharomyces cerevisiae isolates

期刊

NATURE
卷 556, 期 7701, 页码 339-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0030-5

关键词

-

资金

  1. France Genomique [ANR-10-INBS-09-08]
  2. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R01 GM101091-01]
  3. ATIP-Avenir (CNRS/INSERM)
  4. Fondation ARC [SFI20111203947, PDF20150602803]
  5. French National Research Agency [ANR-13-BSV6-0006-01, ANR-16-CE12-0019, ANR-11-LABX-0028-01]
  6. Canceropole PACA (AAP emergence)
  7. DuPont
  8. Ministere de l'Enseignement Superieur
  9. La Ligue Contre le Cancer [GB-MA-CD-11287]
  10. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-16-CE12-0019, ANR-13-BSV6-0006] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Large-scale population genomic surveys are essential to explore the phenotypic diversity of natural populations. Here we report the whole-genome sequencing and phenotyping of 1,011 Saccharomyces cerevisiae isolates, which together provide an accurate evolutionary picture of the genomic variants that shape the species-wide phenotypic landscape of this yeast. Genomic analyses support a single 'out-of-China' origin for this species, followed by several independent domestication events. Although domesticated isolates exhibit high variation in ploidy, aneuploidy and genome content, genome evolution in wild isolates is mainly driven by the accumulation of single nucleotide polymorphisms. A common feature is the extensive loss of heterozygosity, which represents an essential source of inter-individual variation in this mainly asexual species. Most of the single nucleotide polymorphisms, including experimentally identified functional polymorphisms, are present at very low frequencies. The largest numbers of variants identified by genome-wide association are copy-number changes, which have a greater phenotypic effect than do single nucleotide polymorphisms. This resource will guide future population genomics and genotype-phenotype studies in this classic model system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据