4.8 Article

Artificial sweeteners induce glucose intolerance by altering the gut microbiota

期刊

NATURE
卷 514, 期 7521, 页码 181-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/nature13793

关键词

-

资金

  1. Weizmann Institute management
  2. Nancy and Stephen Grand Israel National Center for Personalized Medicine (INCPM)
  3. Boehringer Ingelheim Fonds PhD Fellowship
  4. Morris Kahn Fellowships for Systems Biology
  5. National Institute of Health (NIH)
  6. European Research Council (ERC)
  7. Abisch Frenkel Foundation for the Promotion of Life Sciences
  8. Gurwin Family Fund for Scientific Research
  9. Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust
  10. Crown Endowment Fund for Immunological Research
  11. estate of J. Gitlitz
  12. estate of L. Hershkovich
  13. Rising Tide foundation
  14. Minerva Stiftung foundation
  15. European Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Non-caloric artificial sweeteners (NAS) are among the most widely used food additives worldwide, regularly consumed by lean and obese individuals alike. NAS consumption is considered safe and beneficial owing to their low caloric content, yet supporting scientific data remain sparse and controversial. Here we demonstrate that consumption of commonly used NAS formulations drives the development of glucose intolerance through induction of compositional and functional alterations to the intestinal microbiota. These NAS-mediated deleterious metabolic effects are abrogated by antibiotic treatment, and are fully transferrable to germ-free mice upon faecal transplantation of microbiota configurations from NAS-consuming mice, or of microbiota anaerobically incubated in the presence of NAS. We identify NAS-altered microbial metabolic pathways that are linked to host susceptibility to metabolic disease, and demonstrate similar NAS-induced dysbiosis and glucose intolerance in healthy human subjects. Collectively, our results link NAS consumption, dysbiosis and metabolic abnormalities, thereby calling for a reassessment of massive NAS usage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据