4.8 Article

DNA-damage-induced differentiation of leukaemic cells as an anti-cancer barrier

期刊

NATURE
卷 514, 期 7520, 页码 107-+

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature13483

关键词

-

资金

  1. Leukemia and Lymphoma Society
  2. National Cancer Institute [CA66996, CA140575]
  3. National Institutes of Health
  4. National Cancer Institute
  5. Center for Cancer Research
  6. Ellison Medical Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Self-renewal is the hallmark feature both of normal stem cells and cancer stem cells(1). Since the regenerative capacity of normal haematopoietic stem cells is limited by the accumulation of reactive oxygen species and DNA double-strand breaks(2-4), we speculated that DNA damage might also constrain leukaemic self-renewal and malignant haematopoiesis. Here we show that the histone methyl-transferase MLL4, a suppressor of B-cell lymphoma(5,6), is required for stem-cell activity and an aggressive form of acutemyeloid leukaemia harbouring the MLL-AF9 oncogene. Deletion of MLL4 enhances myelopoiesis and myeloid differentiation of leukaemic blasts, which protects mice from death related to acute myeloid leukaemia. MLL4 exerts its function by regulating transcriptional programs associated with the antioxidant response. Addition of reactive oxygen species scavengers or ectopic expression of FOXO3 protects MLL-/- MLL-AF9 cells from DNA damage and inhibits myeloid maturation. Similar to MLL4 deficiency, loss of ATM or BRCA1 sensitizes transformed cells to differentiation, suggesting that myeloid differentiation is promoted by loss of genome integrity. Indeed, we show that restriction-enzyme-induced double-strand breaks are sufficient to induce differentiation of MLL-AF9 blasts, which requires cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21(Cip1) (Cdkn1a) activity. In summary, we have uncovered an unexpected tumour-promoting role of genome guardians in enforcing the oncogene-induced differentiation blockade in acute myeloid leukaemia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据