4.8 Article

Structure of the rabbit ryanodine receptor RyR1 at near-atomic resolution

期刊

NATURE
卷 517, 期 7532, 页码 50-+

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature14063

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2015CB910101, 2011CB910501, 2014ZX09507003006]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31321062, 31130002, 31125009]
  3. European Union
  4. UK Medical Research Council [MC_UP_A025_1013]
  5. Medical Research Council [MC_UP_A025_1013] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. MRC [MC_UP_A025_1013] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ryanodine receptors (RyRs) are high-conductance intracellular Ca2+ channels that play a pivotal role in the excitation-contraction coupling of skeletal and cardiac muscles. RyRs are the largest known ion channels, with a homotetrameric organization and approximately 5,000 residues in each protomer. Here we report the structure of the rabbit RyR1 in complex with its modulator FKBP12 at an overall resolution of 3.8 angstrom, determined by single-particle electron cryomicroscopy. Three previously uncharacterized domains, named central, handle and helical domains, display the armadillo repeat fold. These domains, together with the amino-terminal domain, constitute a network of superhelical scaffold for binding and propagation of conformational changes. The channel domain exhibits the voltage-gated ion channel superfamily fold with distinct features. A negative-charge-enriched hairpin loop connecting S5 and the pore helix is positioned above the entrance to the selectivity-filter vestibule. The four elongated S6 segments form a right-handed helical bundle that closes the pore at the cytoplasmic border of the membrane. Allosteric regulation of the pore by the cytoplasmic domains is mediated through extensive interactions between the central domains and the channel domain. These structural features explain high ion conductance by RyRs and the long-range allosteric regulation of channel activities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据