4.8 Article

A cascade of DNA-binding proteins for sexual commitment and development in Plasmodium

期刊

NATURE
卷 507, 期 7491, 页码 253-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/nature12970

关键词

-

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust [083811/Z/07/Z, 085349, 098051]
  2. Evimalar [242095]
  3. Medical Research Council [G0501670]
  4. National Institutes of Health [R01 AI076276]
  5. Centre for Quantitative Biology [P50GM071508]
  6. Howard Hughes Medical Institute fellowship of the Damon Runyon Cancer Research Foundation
  7. Wellcome Trust [083811/Z/07/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust
  8. Medical Research Council [G0501670] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. MRC [G0501670] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Commitment to and completion of sexual development are essential for malaria parasites (protists of the genus Plasmodium) to be transmitted through mosquitoes(1). The molecular mechanism(s) responsible for commitment have been hitherto unknown. Here we show that PbAP2-G, a conserved member of the apicomplexan AP2 (ApiAP2) family of DNA-binding proteins, is essential for the commitment of asexually replicating forms to sexual development in Plasmodium berghei, a malaria parasite of rodents. PbAP2-G was identified from mutations in its encoding gene, PBANKA_143750, which account for the loss of sexual development frequently observed in parasites transmitted artificially by blood passage. Systematic gene deletion of conserved ApiAP2 genes in Plasmodium confirmed the role of PbAP2-G and revealed a second ApiAP2 member (PBANKA_103430, here termed PbAP2-G2) that significantly modulates but does not abolish gametocytogenesis, indicating that a cascade of ApiAP2 proteins are involved in commitment to the production and maturation of gametocytes. The data suggest a mechanism of commitment to gametocytogenesis in Plasmodium consistent with a positive feedback loop involving PbAP2-G that could be exploited to prevent the transmission of this pernicious parasite.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据