4.8 Article

Derived immune and ancestral pigmentation alleles in a 7,000-year-old Mesolithic European

期刊

NATURE
卷 507, 期 7491, 页码 225-+

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature12960

关键词

-

资金

  1. Danish National Research Foundation
  2. ERC [260372, 310372]
  3. FEDER
  4. Spanish Government [BFU2012-38236]
  5. Spanish Multiple Sclerosis Netowrk (REEM) of the Instituto de Salud Carlos III [RD12/0032/0011, BFU2011-28549, BFU2012-34157, 300554]
  6. NIH NRSA [F32GM106656]
  7. NIH [R01-HG007089]
  8. NSF [DBI-1103639]
  9. Australian NHMRC
  10. Basque Government (DEUI)
  11. European Research Council (ERC) [260372] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)
  12. ICREA Funding Source: Custom

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ancient genomic sequences have started to reveal the origin and the demographic impact of farmers from the Neolithic period spreading into Europe(1-3). The adoption of farming, stock breeding and sedentary societies during the Neolithic may have resulted in adaptive changes in genes associated with immunity and diet(4). However, the limited data available from earlier hunter-gatherers preclude an understanding of the selective processes associated with this crucial transition to agriculture in recent human evolution. Here we sequence an approximately 7,000-year-old Mesolithic skeleton discovered at the La Brana-Arintero site in Leon, Spain, to retrieve a complete pre-agricultural European human genome. Analysis of this genome in the context of other ancient samples suggests the existence of a common ancient genomic signature across western and central Eurasia from the Upper Paleolithic to the Mesolithic. The La Brana individual carries ancestral alleles in several skin pigmentation genes, suggesting that the light skin of modern Europeans was not yet ubiquitous in Mesolithic times. Moreover, we provide evidence that a significant number of derived, putatively adaptive variants associated with pathogen resistance in modern Europeans were already present in this hunter-gatherer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据