4.8 Article

Severe malaria is associated with parasite binding to endothelial protein C receptor

期刊

NATURE
卷 498, 期 7455, 页码 502-+

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature12216

关键词

-

资金

  1. University of Copenhagen Program of Excellence
  2. Lundbeck Foundation
  3. Danish International Development Agency
  4. Augustinus Fonden
  5. Malaria Capacity Development Consortium
  6. Danish Medical Research Council
  7. National Institutes of Health [R01 AI47953, U19 AI089688]
  8. Medical Research Council
  9. Lundbeck Foundation [R108-2012-10328] Funding Source: researchfish
  10. Medical Research Council [G0901062] Funding Source: researchfish
  11. MRC [G0901062] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sequestration of Plasmodium falciparum-infected erythrocytes in host blood vessels is a key triggering event in the pathogenesis of severe childhood malaria, which is responsible for about one million deaths every year(1). Sequestration is mediated by specific interactions between members of the P. falciparum erythrocyte membrane protein 1 (PfEMP1) family and receptors on the endothelial lining(2). Severe childhood malaria is associated with expression of specific PfEMP1 subtypes containing domain cassettes (DCs) 8 and 13 (ref. 3), but the endothelial receptor for parasites expressing these proteins was unknown(4,5). Here we identify endothelial protein C receptor (EPCR), which mediates the cytoprotective effects of activated protein C-6, as the endothelial receptor for DC8 and DC13 PfEMP1. We show that EPCR binding is mediated through the amino-terminal cysteine-rich interdomain region (CIDRa1) of DC8 and group A PfEMP1 subfamilies, and that CIDRa1 interferes with protein C binding to EPCR. This PfEMP1 adhesive property links P. falciparum cytoadhesion to a host receptor involved in anticoagulation and endothelial cytoprotective pathways, and has implications for understanding malaria pathology and the development of new malaria interventions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据