4.8 Article

Aegilops tauschii draft genome sequence reveals a gene repertoire for wheat adaptation

期刊

NATURE
卷 496, 期 7443, 页码 91-95

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature12028

关键词

-

资金

  1. National 863 Project [2012AA10A308, 2011AA100104]
  2. International S&T Cooperation Program of China [2008DFB30080]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31171548, 31071415]
  4. National Basic Research Program of China [2010CB125900]
  5. Core Research Budget of the Non-profit Governmental Research [201013]
  6. National Program on R&D of Transgenic Plants [2011ZX08009-001, 2011ZX08002-002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

About 8,000 years ago in the Fertile Crescent, a spontaneous hybridization of the wild diploid grass Aegilops tauschii (2n = 14; DD) with the cultivated tetraploid wheat Triticum turgidum (2n = 4x = 28; AABB) resulted in hexaploid wheat (T. aestivum; 2n = 6x = 42; AABBDD)(1,2). Wheat has since become a primary staple crop worldwide as a result of its enhanced adaptability to a wide range of climates and improved grain quality for the production of baker's flour(2). Here we describe sequencing the Ae. tauschii genome and obtaining a roughly 90-fold depth of short reads from libraries with various insert sizes, to gain a better understanding of this genetically complex plant. The assembled scaffolds represented 83.4% of the genome, of which 65.9% comprised transposable elements. We generated comprehensive RNA-Seq data and used it to identify 43,150 protein-coding genes, of which 30,697 (71.1%) were uniquely anchored to chromosomes with an integrated high-density genetic map. Whole-genome analysis revealed gene family expansion in Ae. tauschii of agronomically relevant gene families that were associated with disease resistance, abiotic stress tolerance and grain quality. This draft genome sequence provides insight into the environmental adaptation of bread wheat and can aid in defining the large and complicated genomes of wheat species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据