4.8 Article

Predominant archaea in marine sediments degrade detrital proteins

期刊

NATURE
卷 496, 期 7444, 页码 215-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/nature12033

关键词

-

资金

  1. Danish National Research Foundation
  2. German Max Planck Society
  3. NSF Center for Dark Energy Biosphere Investigations [NSF-157595]
  4. Danish Council for Independent Research-Natural Sciences
  5. Villum Kann Rasmussen Foundation
  6. EU Marie Curie fellowship
  7. German Research Foundation
  8. USA National Science Foundation [EF-826924, OCE-821374, OCE-1019242]
  9. Direct For Biological Sciences
  10. Div Of Biological Infrastructure [1226726] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  11. Directorate For Geosciences
  12. Division Of Ocean Sciences [1232982] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Half of the microbial cells in the Earth's oceans are found in sediments(1). Many of these cells are members of the Archaea(2), single-celled prokaryotes in a domain of life separate from Bacteria and Eukaryota. However, most of these archaea lack cultured representatives, leaving their physiologies and placement on the tree of life uncertain. Here we show that the uncultured miscellaneous crenar-chaeotal group (MCG) and marine benthic group-D (MBG-D) are among the most numerous archaea in the marine sub-sea floor. Single-cell genomic sequencing of one cell of MCG and three cells of MBG-D indicated that they form new branches basal to the archaeal phyla Thaumarchaeota(3) and Aigarchaeota(4), for MCG, and the order Thermoplasmatales, for MBG-D. All four cells encoded extracellular protein-degrading enzymes such as gingipain and clostripain that are known to be effective in environments chemically similar to marine sediments. Furthermore, we found these two types of peptidase to be abundant and active in marine sediments, indicating that uncultured archaea may have a previously undiscovered role in protein remineralization in anoxic marine sediments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据