4.8 Article

Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 is a functional receptor for the emerging human coronavirus-EMC

期刊

NATURE
卷 495, 期 7440, 页码 251-254

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature12005

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Union FP7 [223498]
  2. ANTIGONE [278976]
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation [31003A_132898]
  4. 3R Research Foundation Switzerland [128-11]
  5. German Research Foundation (DFG) [DR 772/3-1, KAl241/18-1]
  6. German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF SARS II)
  7. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [31003A_132898] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Most human coronaviruses cause mild upper respiratory tract disease but may be associated with more severe pulmonary disease in immunocompromised individuals'. However, SARS coronavirus caused severe lower respiratory disease with nearly 10% mortality and evidence of systemic spread(2). Recently, another coronavirus (human coronavirus-Erasmus Medical Center (hCoV-EMC)) was identified in patients with severe and sometimes lethal lower respiratory tract infection(3,4). Viral genome analysis revealed close relatedness to coronaviruses found in bats'. Here we identify dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4; also known as CD26) as a functional receptor for hCoV-EMC. DPP4 specifically co-purified with the receptor-binding Si domain of the hCoV-EMC spike protein from lysates of susceptible Huh-7 cells. Antibodies directed against DPP4 inhibited hCoV-EMC infection of primary human bronchial epithelial cells and Huh-7 cells. Expression of human and bat (Pipistrellus pipistrellus) DPP4 in non-susceptible COS-7 cells enabled infection by hCoV-EMC. The use of the evolutionarily conserved DPP4 protein from different species as a functional receptor provides clues about the host range potential of hCoV-EMC. In addition, it will contribute critically to our understanding of the pathogenesis and epidemiology of this emerging human coronavirus, and may facilitate the development of intervention strategies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据