4.8 Article

D14-SCFD3-dependent degradation of D53 regulates strigolactone signalling

期刊

NATURE
卷 504, 期 7480, 页码 406-+

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature12878

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Transgenic Science and Technology Program [2011ZX08009-003]
  2. 863 National High-tech R&D Program of China [2012AA101100, 2012AA10A301]
  3. Jiangsu Province 333 Program [BRA2012126]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [90917017]
  5. National Science Foundation
  6. Direct For Biological Sciences
  7. Div Of Molecular and Cellular Bioscience [0929100] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Strigolactones (SLs), a newly discovered class of carotenoid-derived phytohormones, are essential for developmental processes that shape plant architecture and interactions with parasitic weeds and symbiotic arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Despite the rapid progress in elucidating the SL biosynthetic pathway, the perception and signalling mechanisms of SL remain poorly understood. Here we show that DWARF 53 (D53) acts as a repressor of SL signalling and that SLs induce its degradation. We find that the rice (Oryza sativa) d53 mutant, which produces an exaggerated number of tillers compared to wild-type plants, is caused by a gain-of-function mutation and is insensitive to exogenous SL treatment. The D53 gene product shares predicted features with the class I Clp ATPase proteins and can form a complex with the a/b hydrolase protein DWARF 14 (D14) and the F-box protein DWARF 3 (D3), two previously identified signalling components potentially responsible for SL perception. We demonstrate that, in a D14- and D3-dependent manner, SLs induce D53 degradation by the proteasome and abrogate its activity in promoting axillary bud outgrowth. Our combined genetic and biochemical data reveal that D53 acts as a repressor of the SL signalling pathway, whose hormone-induced degradation represents a key molecular link between SL perception and responses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据