4.8 Article

Resonant Auger decay driving intermolecular Coulombic decay in molecular dimers

期刊

NATURE
卷 505, 期 7485, 页码 664-666

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature12927

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  2. Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst
  3. Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences of the US Department of Energy at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  4. Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, of the US Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  5. Alexander von Humboldt foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In 1997, it was predicted(1) that an electronically excited atom or molecule placed in a loosely bound chemical system (such as a hydrogen-bonded or van-der-Waals- bonded cluster) could efficiently decay by transferring its excess energy to a neighbouring species that would then emit a low-energy electron. This intermolecular Coulombic decay (ICD) process has since been shown to be a common phenomenon(2-12), raising questions about its role in DNA damage induced by ionizing radiation, in which low-energy electrons are known to play an important part(13,14). It was recently suggested(15) that ICD can be triggered efficiently and site-selectively by resonantly core-exciting a target atom, which then transforms through Auger decay into an ionic species with sufficiently high excitation energy to permit ICD to occur. Here we show experimentally that resonant Auger decay can indeed trigger ICD in dimers of both molecular nitrogen and carbon monoxide. By using ion and electron momentum spectroscopy to measure simultaneously the charged species created in the resonant-Auger-driven ICD cascade, we find that ICD occurs in less time than the 20 femtoseconds it would take for individual molecules to undergo dissociation. Our experimental confirmation of this process and its efficiency may trigger renewed efforts to develop resonant X-ray excitation schemes(16,17) for more localized and targeted cancer radiation therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据