4.8 Article

Genetic programs in human and mouse early embryos revealed by single-cell RNA sequencing

期刊

NATURE
卷 500, 期 7464, 页码 593-+

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature12364

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology in China [2012CB966300, 2011CB966204, 2011CB965102]
  2. International Science and Technology Cooperation Program of China [2011DFB30010]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81271258]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mammalian pre-implantation development is a complex process involving dramatic changes in the transcriptional architecture(1-4). We report here a comprehensive analysis of transcriptome dynamics from oocyte to morula in both human and mouse embryos, using single-cell RNA sequencing. Based on single-nucleotide variants in human blastomere messenger RNAs and paternal-specific single-nucleotide polymorphisms, we identify novel stage-specific monoallelic expression patterns for a significant portion of polymorphic gene transcripts (25 to 53%). By weighted gene co-expression network analysis(5,6), we find that each developmental stage can be delineated concisely by a small number of functional modules of co-expressed genes. This result indicates a sequential order of transcriptional changes in pathways of cell cycle, gene regulation, translation and metabolism, acting in a step-wise fashion from cleavage to morula. Cross-species comparisons with mouse pre-implantation embryos reveal that the majority of human stage-specific modules (7 out of 9) are notably preserved, but developmental specificity and timing differ between human and mouse. Furthermore, we identify conserved key members (or hub genes) of the human and mouse networks. These genes represent novel candidates that are likely to be key in driving mammalian pre-implantation development. Together, the results provide a valuable resource to dissect gene regulatory mechanisms underlying progressive development of early mammalian embryos.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据