4.8 Article

Palaeontological evidence for an Oligocene divergence between Old World monkeys and apes

期刊

NATURE
卷 497, 期 7451, 页码 611-614

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature12161

关键词

-

资金

  1. Tanzania Commission for Science and Technology
  2. US National Science Foundation [EAR-0617561, EAR/IF-0933619, BCS-1127164]
  3. National Geographic Society (CRE)
  4. Louis B. Leakey Foundation
  5. Ohio University Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine
  6. Ohio University Office of Research and Sponsored Programs
  7. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie
  8. Division Of Behavioral and Cognitive Sci [1127164] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  9. Directorate For Geosciences
  10. Division Of Earth Sciences [933619] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Apes and Old World monkeys are prominent components of modern African and Asian ecosystems, yet the earliest phases of their evolutionary history have remained largely undocumented(1). The absence of crown catarrhine fossils older than similar to 20 million years (Myr) has stood in stark contrast to molecular divergence estimates of similar to 25-30 Myr for the split between Cercopithecoidea (Old World monkeys) and Hominoidea (apes), implying long ghost lineages for both clades(2-4). Here we describe the oldest known fossil 'ape', represented by a partial mandible preserving dental features that place it with 'nyanzapithecine' stem hominoids. Additionally, we report the oldest stem member of the Old World monkey clade, represented by a lower third molar. Both specimens were recovered from a precisely dated 25.2-Myr-old stratum in the Rukwa Rift, a segment of the western branch of the East African Rift in Tanzania. These finds extend the fossil record of apes and Old World monkey swell into the Oligocene epoch of Africa, suggesting a possible link between diversification of crown catarrhines and changes in the African landscape brought about by previously unrecognized tectonic activity(5) in the East African rift system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据