4.8 Article

Novel role of PKR in inflammasome activation and HMGB1 release

期刊

NATURE
卷 488, 期 7413, 页码 670-+

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature11290

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [RO1 GM62508, DK052539]
  2. foundation of Elmezzi Graduate School of Molecular Medicine
  3. International Human Frontier Science Program
  4. American Heart Association
  5. MRC [G0700654] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Medical Research Council [G0700654, G0700654B] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The inflammasome regulates the release of caspase activation-dependent cytokines, including interleukin (IL)-1 beta, IL-18 and high-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1)(1-5). By studying HMGB1 release mechanisms, here we identify a role for double-stranded RNA-dependent protein kinase (PKR, also known as EIF2AK2) in inflammasome activation. Exposure of macrophages to inflammasome agonists induced PKR autophosphorylation. PKR inactivation by genetic deletion or pharmacological inhibition severely impaired inflammasome activation in response to double-stranded RNA, ATP, monosodium urate, adjuvant aluminium, rotenone, live Escherichia coli, anthrax lethal toxin, DNA transfection and Salmonella typhimurium infection. PKR deficiency significantly inhibited the secretion of IL-1 beta, IL-18 and HMGB1 in E. coli-induced peritonitis. PKR physically interacts with several inflammasome components, including NOD-like receptor (NLR) family pyrin domain-containing 3 (NLRP3), NLRP1, NLR family CARD domain-containing protein 4 (NLRC4), absent in melanoma 2 (AIM2), and broadly regulates inflammasome activation. PKR autophosphorylation in a cell-free system with recombinant NLRP3, apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a CARD (ASC, also known as PYCARD) and pro-caspase-1 reconstitutes inflammasome activity. These results show a crucial role for PKR in inflammasome activation, and indicate that it should be possible to pharmacologically target this molecule to treat inflammation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据