4.8 Article

Burkitt lymphoma pathogenesis and therapeutic targets from structural and functional genomics

期刊

NATURE
卷 490, 期 7418, 页码 116-120

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature11378

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH, National Cancer Institute, Center for Cancer Research, an NCI SPECS grant [UO1-CA 114778]
  2. Foundation for NIH
  3. Cancer Research UK
  4. Lymphoma/Leukemia Molecular Profiling Project (LLMPP)
  5. Dr Mildred Scheel Stiftung fur Krebsforschung (Deutsche Krebshilfe)
  6. NCI [N01-C0-12400]
  7. Medical Research Council [G9818340B] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Burkitt's lymphoma (BL) can often be cured by intensive chemotherapy, but the toxicity of such therapy precludes its use in the elderly and in patients with endemic BL in developing countries, necessitating new strategies(1). The normal germinal centre B cell is the presumed cell of origin for both BL and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), yet gene expression analysis suggests that these malignancies may use different oncogenic pathways(2). BL is subdivided into a sporadic subtype that is diagnosed in developed countries, the Epstein-Barr-virus-associated endemic subtype, and an HIV-associated subtype, but it is unclear whether these subtypes use similar or divergent oncogenic mechanisms. Here we used high-throughput RNA sequencing and RNA interference screening to discover essential regulatory pathways in BL that cooperate with MYC, the defining oncogene of this cancer. In 70% of sporadic BL cases, mutations affecting the transcription factor TCF3 (E2A) or its negative regulator ID3 fostered TCF3 dependency. TCF3 activated the pro-survival phosphatidylinositol-3-OH kinase pathway in BL, in part by augmenting tonic B-cell receptor signalling. In 38% of sporadic BL cases, oncogenic CCND3 mutations produced highly stable cyclin D3 isoforms that drive cell cycle progression. These findings suggest opportunities to improve therapy for patients with BL.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据