4.8 Article

IL-22BP is regulated by the inflammasome and modulates tumorigenesis in the intestine

期刊

NATURE
卷 491, 期 7423, 页码 259-+

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature11535

关键词

-

资金

  1. Crohn's and Colitis Foundation of America
  2. Stiftung experimentelle Biomedizin
  3. Ernst Jung Foundation
  4. EMBO
  5. American Cancer Society
  6. DFG [SFB841]
  7. [R01DK077905]
  8. [DK-P30-34989]
  9. [U19-AI082713]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chronic mucosal inflammation and tissue damage predisposes patients to the development of colorectal cancer(1). This association could be explained by the hypothesis that the same factors and pathways important for wound healing also promote tumorigenesis. A sensor of tissue damage should induce these factors to promote tissue repair and regulate their action to prevent development of cancer. Interleukin 22 (IL-22), a cytokine of the IL-10 superfamily, has an important role in colonic epithelial cell repair, and its levels are increased in the blood and intestine of inflammatory bowel disease patients(2,3). This cytokine can be neutralized by the soluble IL-22 receptor, known as the IL-22 binding protein (IL-22BP, also known as IL22RA2); however, the significance of endogenous IL-22BP in vivo and the pathways that regulate this receptor are unknown(4,5). Here we describe that IL-22BP has a crucial role in controlling tumorigenesis and epithelial cell proliferation in the colon. IL-22BP is highly expressed by dendritic cells in the colon in steady-state conditions. Sensing of intestinal tissue damage via the NLRP3 or NLRP6 inflammasomes led to an IL-18-dependent downregulation of IL-22BP, thereby increasing the ratio of IL-22/IL-22BP. IL-22, which is induced during intestinal tissue damage, exerted protective properties during the peak of damage, but promoted tumour development if uncontrolled during the recovery phase. Thus, the IL-22-IL-22BP axis critically regulates intestinal tissue repair and tumorigenesis in the colon.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据