4.8 Article

Transiting circumbinary planets Kepler-34 b and Kepler-35 b

期刊

NATURE
卷 481, 期 7382, 页码 475-U85

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature10768

关键词

-

资金

  1. NASA's Science Mission Directorate
  2. Kepler Participating Scientist Program
  3. NSF
  4. NASA
  5. STScI
  6. European Research Council under the European Community
  7. Research Council of KU Leuven
  8. FAS Science Division Research Computing Group at Harvard University
  9. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  10. Division Of Astronomical Sciences [1109928] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  11. Division Of Astronomical Sciences
  12. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1007992] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Most Sun-like stars in the Galaxy reside in gravitationally bound pairs of stars(1,2) (binaries). Although long anticipated(3-8), the existence of a 'circumbinary planet' orbiting such a pair of normal stars was not definitively established until the discovery(9) of the planet transiting (that is, passing in front of) Kepler-16. Questions remained, however, about the prevalence of circumbinary planets and their range of orbital and physical properties. Here we report two additional transiting circumbinary planets: Kepler-34 (AB)b and Kepler-35 (AB)b, referred to here as Kepler-34 b and Kepler-35 b, respectively. Each is a low-density gas-giant planet on an orbit closely aligned with that of its parent stars. Kepler-34 b orbits two Sun-like stars every 289 days, whereas Kepler-35 b orbits a pair of smaller stars (89% and 81% of the Sun's mass) every 131 days. The planets experience large multi-periodic variations in incident stellar radiation arising from the orbital motion of the stars. The observed rate of circumbinary planets in our sample implies that more than similar to 1% of close binary stars have giant planets in nearly coplanar orbits, yielding a Galactic population of at least several million.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据