4.8 Article

Genetic contributions to stability and change in intelligence from childhood to old age

期刊

NATURE
卷 482, 期 7384, 页码 212-215

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature10781

关键词

-

资金

  1. Australian Research Council
  2. National Health and Medical Research Council
  3. BBSRC
  4. EPSRC
  5. ESRC
  6. MRC
  7. BBSRC [BB/F019394/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. MRC [G0700704] Funding Source: UKRI
  9. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/F019394/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  10. Chief Scientist Office [ETM/55, CZB/4/505] Funding Source: researchfish
  11. Medical Research Council [G0700704B, G0701120, G0700704] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding the determinants of healthy mental ageing is a priority for society today(1,2). So far, we know that intelligence differences show high stability from childhood to old age(3,4) and there are estimates of the genetic contribution to intelligence at different ages(5,6). However, attempts to discover whether genetic causes contribute to differences in cognitive ageing have been relatively uninformative(7-10). Here we provide an estimate of the genetic and environmental contributions to stability and change in intelligence across most of the human lifetime. We used genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data from 1,940 unrelated individuals whose intelligence was measured in childhood (age 11 years) and again in old age (age 65, 70 or 79 years)(11,12). We use a statistical method that allows genetic (co)variance to be estimated from SNP data on unrelated individuals(13-17). We estimate that causal genetic variants in linkage disequilibrium with common SNPs account for 0.24 of the variation in cognitive ability change from childhood to old age. Using bivariate analysis, we estimate a genetic correlation between intelligence at age 11 years and in old age of 0.62. These estimates, derived from rarely available data on lifetime cognitive measures, warrant the search for genetic causes of cognitive stability and change.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据