4.8 Article

The genomic landscape of species divergence in Ficedula flycatchers

期刊

NATURE
卷 491, 期 7426, 页码 756-760

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature11584

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Research Council
  2. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Scholar Grant
  3. Swedish Research Council
  4. Swiss National Science Foundation [PBLAB3-134299, PBLAB1-140171]
  5. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation
  6. Swedish National Infrastructure for Computing (SNIC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Unravelling the genomic landscape of divergence between lineages is key to understanding speciation(1). The naturally hybridizing collared flycatcher and pied flycatcher are important avian speciation models(2-7) that show pre- as well as postzygotic isolation(8,9). We sequenced and assembled the 1.1-Gb flycatcher genome, physically mapped the assembly to chromosomes using a low-density linkage map(10) and re-sequenced population samples of each species. Here we show that the genomic landscape of species differentiation is highly heterogeneous with approximately 50 'divergence islands' showing up to 50-fold higher sequence divergence than the genomic background. These non-randomly distributed islands, with between one and three regions of elevated divergence per chromosome irrespective of chromosome size, are characterized by reduced levels of nucleotide diversity, skewed allele-frequency spectra, elevated levels of linkage disequilibrium and reduced proportions of shared polymorphisms in both species, indicative of parallel episodes of selection. Proximity of divergence peaks to genomic regions resistant to sequence assembly, potentially including centromeres and telomeres, indicate that complex repeat structures may drive species divergence. A much higher background level of species divergence of the Z chromosome, and a lower proportion of shared polymorphisms, indicate that sex chromosomes and autosomes are at different stages of speciation. This study provides a roadmap to the emerging field of speciation genomics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据