4.8 Article

Two-dimensional electron gas with universal subbands at the surface of SrTiO3

期刊

NATURE
卷 469, 期 7329, 页码 189-193

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature09720

关键词

-

资金

  1. ANR OXITRONICS
  2. CNRS-CSIC [PICS2008FR1]
  3. National Science Foundation [DMR-0537588]
  4. US DOE [W-7405-ENG-82]
  5. CONICET [PIP 112-200801-00047]
  6. ANPCyT [PICT 837/07]
  7. MOST and NSF of China
  8. Spanish Government [MAT2008-06761-C03, NANOSELECT CSD2007-00041]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As silicon is the basis of conventional electronics, so strontium titanate (SrTiO3) is the foundation of the emerging field of oxide electronics(1,2). SrTiO3 is the preferred template for the creation of exotic, two-dimensional (2D) phases of electron matter at oxide interfaces(3-5) that have metal-insulator transitions(6,7), superconductivity(8,9) or large negative magnetoresistance(10). However, the physical nature of the electronic structure underlying these 2D electron gases (2DEGs), which is crucial to understanding their remarkable properties(11,12), remains elusive. Here we show, using angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy, that there is a highly metallic universal 2DEG at the vacuum-cleaved surface of SrTiO3 (including the non-doped insulating material) independently of bulk carrier densities over more than seven decades. This 2DEG is confined within a region of about five unit cells and has a sheet carrier density of similar to 0.33 electrons per square lattice parameter. The electronic structure consists of multiple subbands of heavy and light electrons. The similarity of this 2DEG to those reported in SrTiO3-based heterostructures(6,8,13) and field-effect transistors(9,14) suggests that different forms of electron confinement at the surface of SrTiO3 lead to essentially the same 2DEG. Our discovery provides a model system for the study of the electronic structure of 2DEGs in SrTiO3-based devices and a novel means of generating 2DEGs at the surfaces of transition-metal oxides.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据