4.8 Article

Charge order and three-site distortions in the Verwey structure of magnetite

期刊

NATURE
卷 481, 期 7380, 页码 173-176

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature10704

关键词

-

资金

  1. Leverhulme Trust
  2. EPSRC
  3. STFC
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/F02083X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. EPSRC [EP/F02083X/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The mineral magnetite (Fe(3)O(4)) undergoes a complex structural distortion and becomes electrically insulating at temperatures less than 125 kelvin. Verwey proposed in 1939 that this transition is driven by a charge ordering of Fe(2+) and Fe(3+) ions(1), but the ground state of the low-temperature phase has remained contentious(2,3) because twinning of crystal domains hampers diffraction studies of the structure(4). Recent powder diffraction refinements(5-7) and resonant X-ray studies(8-12) have led to proposals of a variety of charge-ordered and bond-dimerized ground-state models(13-19). Here we report the full low-temperature superstructure of magnetite, determined by high-energy X-ray diffraction from an almost single-domain, 40-micrometre grain, and identify the emergent order. The acentric structure is described by a superposition of 168 atomic displacement waves (frozen phonon modes), all with amplitudes of less than 0.24 angstroms. Distortions of the FeO(6) octahedra show that Verwey's hypothesis is correct to a first approximation and that the charge and Fe(2+) orbital order are consistent with a recent prediction(17). However, anomalous shortening of some Fe-Fe distances suggests that the localized electrons are distributed over linear three-Fe-site units, which we call 'trimerons'. The charge order and three-site distortions induce substantial off-centre atomic displacements and couple the resulting large electrical polarization to the magnetization. Trimerons may be important quasiparticles in magnetite above the Verwey transition and in other transition metal oxides.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据