4.8 Article

Parallel evolution of domesticated Caenorhabditis species targets pheromone receptor genes

期刊

NATURE
卷 477, 期 7364, 页码 321-U92

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/nature10378

关键词

-

资金

  1. Damon Runyon Fellowship
  2. Medical Scientist Training Program (MSTP) [GM07739]
  3. Paul and Daisy Soros Fellowship
  4. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [K99 GM092859]
  5. HHMI
  6. [R00GM87533]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Evolution can follow predictable genetic trajectories(1), indicating that discrete environmental shifts can select for reproducible genetic changes(2-4). Conspecific individuals are an important feature of an animal's environment, and a potential source of selective pressures. Here we show that adaptation of two Caenorhabditis species to growth at high density, a feature common to domestic environments, occurs by reproducible genetic changes to pheromone receptor genes. Chemical communication through pheromones that accumulate during high-density growth causes young nematode larvae to enter the long-lived but non-reproductive dauer stage. Two strains of Caenorhabditis elegans grown at high density have independently acquired multigenic resistance to pheromone-induced dauer formation. In each strain, resistance to the pheromone ascaroside C3 results from a deletion that disrupts the adjacent chemoreceptor genes serpentine receptor class g (srg)-36 and -37. Through misexpression experiments, we show that these genes encode redundant G-protein-coupled receptors for ascaroside C3. Multigenic resistance to dauer formation has also arisen in high-density cultures of a different nematode species, Caenorhabditis briggsae, resulting in part from deletion of an srg gene paralogous to srg-36 and srg-37. These results demonstrate rapid remodelling of the chemoreceptor repertoire as an adaptation to specific environments, and indicate that parallel changes to a common genetic substrate can affect life-history traits across species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据