4.8 Article

An armoured Cambrian lobopodian from China with arthropod-like appendages

期刊

NATURE
卷 470, 期 7335, 页码 526-530

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature09704

关键词

-

资金

  1. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation at the Freie Universitat Berlin
  2. National Science Foundation of China [40802011, 40830208]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Continental Dynamics, Northwest University
  4. DFG [Forschergruppe 736]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cambrian fossil Lagerstatten preserving soft-bodied organisms have contributed much towards our understanding of metazoan origins(1-3). Lobopodians are a particularly interesting group that diversified and flourished in the Cambrian seas. Resembling 'worms with legs', they have long attracted much attention in that they may have given rise to both Onychophora (velvet worms)(4-6) and Tardigrada (water bears)(7,8), as well as to arthropods in general(9-12). Here we describe Diania cactiformis gen. et sp. nov. as an 'armoured' lobopodian from the Chengjiang fossil Lagerstatte (Cambrian Stage 3), Yunnan, southwestern China. Although sharing features with other typical lobopodians, it is remarkable for possessing robust and probably sclerotized appendages, with what appear to be articulated elements. In terms of limb morphology it is therefore closer to the arthropod condition, to our knowledge, than any lobopodian recorded until now. Phylogenetic analysis recovers it in a derived position, close to Arthropoda; thus, it seems to belong to a grade of organization close to the point of becoming a true arthropod. Further, D. cactiformis could imply that arthropodization (sclerotization of the limbs) preceded arthrodization (sclerotization of the body). Comparing our fossils with other lobopodian appendage morphologies-see Kerygmachela(9,10), Jianshanopodia(13) and Megadictyon(12)-reinforces the hypothesis that the group as a whole is paraphyletic, with different taxa expressing different grades of arthropodization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据