4.8 Article

Recapitulation of premature ageing with iPSCs from Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome

期刊

NATURE
卷 472, 期 7342, 页码 221-225

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature09879

关键词

-

资金

  1. CIRM [TG2-01158]
  2. AFAR/Ellison Medical Foundation
  3. NIH [T32 CA009370, R01-DA025779, P41 RR011823]
  4. G. Harold and Leila Y. Mathers Charitable Foundation
  5. Sanofi-Aventis
  6. Ellison Medical Foundation
  7. MICINN
  8. Fundacion Cellex (JCIB)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome (HGPS) is a rare and fatal human premature ageing disease(1-5), characterized by premature arteriosclerosis and degeneration of vascular smooth muscle cells (SMCs)(6-8). HGPS is caused by a single point mutation in the lamin A (LMNA) gene, resulting in the generation of progerin, a truncated splicing mutant of lamin A. Accumulation of progerin leads to various ageing-associated nuclear defects including disorganization of nuclear lamina and loss of heterochromatin(9-12). Here we report the generation of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) from fibroblasts obtained from patients with HGPS. HGPS-iPSCs show absence of progerin, and more importantly, lack the nuclear envelope and epigenetic alterations normally associated with premature ageing. Upon differentiation of HGPS-iPSCs, progerin and its ageing-associated phenotypic consequences are restored. Specifically, directed differentiation of HGPS-iPSCs to SMCs leads to the appearance of premature senescence phenotypes associated with vascular ageing. Additionally, our studies identify DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit (DNAPKcs, also known as PRKDC) as a downstream target of progerin. The absence of nuclear DNAPK holoenzyme correlates with premature as well as physiological ageing. Because progerin also accumulates during physiological ageing(6,12,13), our results provide an in vitro iPSC-based model to study the pathogenesis of human premature and physiological vascular ageing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据