4.8 Article

Ultrabright source of entangled photon pairs

期刊

NATURE
卷 466, 期 7303, 页码 217-220

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature09148

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Project NanoEPR
  2. French ANR [P3N]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A source of triggered entangled photon pairs is a key component in quantum information science(1); it is needed to implement functions such as linear quantum computation(2), entanglement swapping(3) and quantum teleportation(4). Generation of polarization entangled photon pairs can be obtained through parametric conversion in nonlinear optical media(5-7) or by making use of the radiative decay of two electron-hole pairs trapped in a semiconductor quantum dot(8-11). Today, these sources operate at a very low rate, below 0.01 photon pairs per excitation pulse, which strongly limits their applications. For systems based on parametric conversion, this low rate is intrinsically due to the Poissonian statistics of the source(12). Conversely, a quantum dot can emit a single pair of entangled photons with a probability near unity but suffers from a naturally very low extraction efficiency. Here we show that this drawback can be overcome by coupling an optical cavity in the formof a 'photonic molecule'(13) to a single quantum dot. Two coupled identical pillars-the photonic molecule-were etched in a semiconductor planar microcavity, using an optical lithography method(14) that ensures a deterministic coupling to the biexciton and exciton energy states of a pre-selected quantum dot. The Purcell effect ensures that most entangled photon pairs are emitted into two cavity modes, while improving the indistinguishability of the two optical recombination paths(15,16). A polarization entangled photon pair rate of 0.12 per excitation pulse (with a concurrence of 0.34) is collected in the first lens. Our results open the way towards the fabrication of solid state triggered sources of entangled photon pairs, with an overall (creation and collection) efficiency of 80%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据