4.8 Article

Sensitivity to perturbations in vivo implies high noise and suggests rate coding in cortex

期刊

NATURE
卷 466, 期 7302, 页码 123-U142

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature09086

关键词

-

资金

  1. Gatsby Charitable Foundation
  2. US National Institute of Mental Health [R01 MH62447]
  3. Wellcome Trust
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
  5. Medical Research Council
  6. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/C010841/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. Medical Research Council [G0500244] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. MRC [G0500244] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is well known that neural activity exhibits variability, in the sense that identical sensory stimuli produce different responses(1-3), but it has been difficult to determine what this variability means. Is it noise, or does it carry important information-about, for example, the internal state of the organism? Here we address this issue from the bottom up, by asking whether small perturbations to activity in cortical networks are amplified. Based on in vivo whole-cell patch-clamp recordings in rat barrel cortex, we find that a perturbation consisting of a single extra spike in one neuron produces approximately 28 additional spikes in its postsynaptic targets. We also show, using simultaneous intra-and extracellular recordings, that a single spike in a neuron produces a detectable increase in firing rate in the local network. Theoretical analysis indicates that this amplification leads to intrinsic, stimulus-independent variations in membrane potential of the order of +/- 2.2-4.5 mV-variations that are pure noise, and so carry no information at all. Therefore, for the brain to perform reliable computations, it must either use a rate code, or generate very large, fast depolarizing events, such as those proposed by the theory of synfire chains(4,5). However, in our in vivo recordings, we found that such events were very rare. Our findings are thus consistent with the idea that cortex is likely to use primarily a rate code.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据